Tuesday, April 29, 2008
TAXONOMY OF THE LIBERATION ORGANIZATIONS
So we can imagine, for example, the whole set of Abrahamic progressive religious trends. This would include Jewish, Islamic and Christian phyla, orders, classes all the way down to genie and species. The Catholic Worker folks are inside the set of progressive Christian religious tends as well as the subset of progressive Catholic trends. So maybe the genus would be Catholic Worker and the species would be a particular Catholic Worker community or individual.
CATHOLIC WORKERS DO IT AGAIN!
I don't really have any facts, but I understand there was a protest last weekend at the Kansas City Federal Building against anti-immigrant policies. The Catholic Workers were apparently behind it. How do we know? Zorro works alone. Actually the coverage I saw was sparse, free of educational value pretty much. (Even Zorro has a trouble with the corporate media.) [Forgive me, believer, and forgive me, atheist, for I am an atheist who says, "Thank God for the Catholic Worker folk and their noble movement".] Warning, these people are very nice.!
Forgive me if I think that it should be obvious as to why the Catholic Worker community should be considered progressive. To put it succinctly, the Catholic Worker folks agree with the Pope when the Pope has a progressive position but disagree with him when he does not. I think they obviously side with the poor and try to serve them quite devoutly. Most of these Catholic Worker people are against all the militarism so U. S. Imperialism loses all of its potential support just with that. They are often feminists even if many remain inside the Catholic church proper or Catholic holy orders. I don't know if the catholic worker workers regard themselves as in a holy order but it would be interesting to find out.
Here is a living progressive community in many cities across the nation.
Of course the Catholic Worker communities are also political. They engage in various forms of public education, protests and organzing. I think of them as being cousins of the Catholic Plowshares Movement, truly committed antinuclear and antiwar activists who have served decades and perhaps centuries for their exemplary acts of civil disobedience. I hope to add some documents from a local Catholic Worker group to this blog in the future.
Forgive me if I think that it should be obvious as to why the Catholic Worker community should be considered progressive. To put it succinctly, the Catholic Worker folks agree with the Pope when the Pope has a progressive position but disagree with him when he does not. I think they obviously side with the poor and try to serve them quite devoutly. Most of these Catholic Worker people are against all the militarism so U. S. Imperialism loses all of its potential support just with that. They are often feminists even if many remain inside the Catholic church proper or Catholic holy orders. I don't know if the catholic worker workers regard themselves as in a holy order but it would be interesting to find out.
Here is a living progressive community in many cities across the nation.
Of course the Catholic Worker communities are also political. They engage in various forms of public education, protests and organzing. I think of them as being cousins of the Catholic Plowshares Movement, truly committed antinuclear and antiwar activists who have served decades and perhaps centuries for their exemplary acts of civil disobedience. I hope to add some documents from a local Catholic Worker group to this blog in the future.
Jeremiah Wright is Righteous and Black Liberation Theology is a Progressive Trend
Well, Obama has shown his true political values by going after Reverend Jeremiah Wright. I have been listening to various interviews and speeches by the Reverend and while I don't think HIV was created deliberately I find his other views are pretty much liberation theology as applied to the black experience in the United States.
Of course, listening to the Reverend you get a lot of his positions on matters social and political in a few minutes. Reverend Wright is plain spoken. He does not pander in mere generalities.
Obama, on the other hand, remains the great undefined hope. Of course Obama is so persuasive and nice you almost think he has actually said something, but his rhetoric is rather general, rather imprecise. He speaks of "common hopes" and "common dreams" without clearly defining what those dreams are. He speaks of bridging a gap but a gap to where? How will he, a lone candidate or President bridge that gap? He hasn't said what gap he is talking about. It may be the gap in his campaign, anything of substance.
But Obama has finally taken a stand. An angry prophet of the the social gospel will not be heard. There is "nothing constructive" about Reverend Wright's prophetic voice according to the man who would be President of the Empire. He evaluates Reverend Wright's comments before the National Press Club as "rants not grounded in truth". So with an Obamaesque verbal excess he called Reverend Wright, in plain speech, a destructive liar.
Of course one black man distancing himself from a trouble maker of the same race is also part of the black experience. I suppose we could imagine that Obama secretly harbors liberation theology as his guiding ideology but his actions and deeds indicate the opposite. Reverend Jeremiah Wright has been speaking the truth and upholding the values of a progressive Christian trend.
Reverend Wright opposes empire and U. S. imperialism. Obama, on the other hand, wants to be chief warmonger. That is what the office of the President is, chief warmonger.
Oooh I bet Obama wouldn't like me either!
I thank Reverend Wright for saying the right things about the oppression of African-Americans and the crimes of the United States empire. Obviously the Biblical prophets were not popular with the powerful of their era. Jesus didn't try to become a loyal Roman or even run the Sanhedrin. It is Obama who is out of line, not Reverend Wright. He is caving into the racism and narrow bigotry of the oppressor elites who run America. He should unite with Reverend Wright and the right.
When I first saw Obama I was impressed with his extraordinary eloquence and stealthiness. His diplomatic language, calm demeanor and soft sell approach is quite impressive. It was quite revealing how his very mention of some white Americans being bitter about their lives unleashed an irrational fury directed at Obama, I still don't know for what. Apparently we can't talk about bitter whites or bitter blacks, not in the corporate media. Nor do our keepers and oppressors of the Democratic and Republican Parties want to talk about how angry many working Americans are about the way they are getting screwed by the rich. The ruling elites look for scapegoats and hope to focus the righteous anger of the multinational working class at the foreign enemy.
The rich are still getting richer as more and more of us go to the poorhouse. Neither Hillary nor Obama say much about that, not really, and they aren't progressive about foreign affairs either. They both want to bomb, bomb , bomb. Of course to get the peace vote they say things about withdrawing troops but I'll believe that when I see it and I think if you look carefully at what they say and how they say it that they are both supporting the permanent occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Reverend Jeremiah Wright is the real thing and Obama is, like Wright says, a POLITICIAN, politicians want everyone to like them. So Obama has said as little about race as possible and his white enemies are trying to draw him into it because if he makes white folks happy with what he says he is likely to alienate many blacks and if it says what he thinks that makes Jeremiah Wright happy he will alienate a lot of whites. This is not to say that there are not many Whites who would hate any person of color in the White House.
Not everyone likes a person, not even a member of the clergy who talks about disappointing and disturbing facts. When these disturbing facts violate myths about the history of the United States, those who honestly cling to those myths feel threatened. Any politician in the public eye will be subject to a campaign of ridicule if they expose the myths that so many Americans still worship. One of the most crucial myths is that American workers are a happy and contented.
There is a special fear and loathing of the righteous rage of the oppressed. Today that rage has a black face because we frankly have no
image of progressive white worker outrage to compete with it. White worker discontent is almost inconceivable in the propaganda system.
Then the lack of these images of white workers in struggle also reflects the stranglehold a sort of right-wing trade unionism and anti-labor legislation has on American workers.
A prophet and a real clergy person will defend unpopular positions even if there is a personal cost associated with it. Most self proclaimed Christians will not do this. Black liberation theology does. They talk the talk. Obama won't even do that!
Of course, listening to the Reverend you get a lot of his positions on matters social and political in a few minutes. Reverend Wright is plain spoken. He does not pander in mere generalities.
Obama, on the other hand, remains the great undefined hope. Of course Obama is so persuasive and nice you almost think he has actually said something, but his rhetoric is rather general, rather imprecise. He speaks of "common hopes" and "common dreams" without clearly defining what those dreams are. He speaks of bridging a gap but a gap to where? How will he, a lone candidate or President bridge that gap? He hasn't said what gap he is talking about. It may be the gap in his campaign, anything of substance.
But Obama has finally taken a stand. An angry prophet of the the social gospel will not be heard. There is "nothing constructive" about Reverend Wright's prophetic voice according to the man who would be President of the Empire. He evaluates Reverend Wright's comments before the National Press Club as "rants not grounded in truth". So with an Obamaesque verbal excess he called Reverend Wright, in plain speech, a destructive liar.
Of course one black man distancing himself from a trouble maker of the same race is also part of the black experience. I suppose we could imagine that Obama secretly harbors liberation theology as his guiding ideology but his actions and deeds indicate the opposite. Reverend Jeremiah Wright has been speaking the truth and upholding the values of a progressive Christian trend.
Reverend Wright opposes empire and U. S. imperialism. Obama, on the other hand, wants to be chief warmonger. That is what the office of the President is, chief warmonger.
Oooh I bet Obama wouldn't like me either!
I thank Reverend Wright for saying the right things about the oppression of African-Americans and the crimes of the United States empire. Obviously the Biblical prophets were not popular with the powerful of their era. Jesus didn't try to become a loyal Roman or even run the Sanhedrin. It is Obama who is out of line, not Reverend Wright. He is caving into the racism and narrow bigotry of the oppressor elites who run America. He should unite with Reverend Wright and the right.
When I first saw Obama I was impressed with his extraordinary eloquence and stealthiness. His diplomatic language, calm demeanor and soft sell approach is quite impressive. It was quite revealing how his very mention of some white Americans being bitter about their lives unleashed an irrational fury directed at Obama, I still don't know for what. Apparently we can't talk about bitter whites or bitter blacks, not in the corporate media. Nor do our keepers and oppressors of the Democratic and Republican Parties want to talk about how angry many working Americans are about the way they are getting screwed by the rich. The ruling elites look for scapegoats and hope to focus the righteous anger of the multinational working class at the foreign enemy.
The rich are still getting richer as more and more of us go to the poorhouse. Neither Hillary nor Obama say much about that, not really, and they aren't progressive about foreign affairs either. They both want to bomb, bomb , bomb. Of course to get the peace vote they say things about withdrawing troops but I'll believe that when I see it and I think if you look carefully at what they say and how they say it that they are both supporting the permanent occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Reverend Jeremiah Wright is the real thing and Obama is, like Wright says, a POLITICIAN, politicians want everyone to like them. So Obama has said as little about race as possible and his white enemies are trying to draw him into it because if he makes white folks happy with what he says he is likely to alienate many blacks and if it says what he thinks that makes Jeremiah Wright happy he will alienate a lot of whites. This is not to say that there are not many Whites who would hate any person of color in the White House.
Not everyone likes a person, not even a member of the clergy who talks about disappointing and disturbing facts. When these disturbing facts violate myths about the history of the United States, those who honestly cling to those myths feel threatened. Any politician in the public eye will be subject to a campaign of ridicule if they expose the myths that so many Americans still worship. One of the most crucial myths is that American workers are a happy and contented.
There is a special fear and loathing of the righteous rage of the oppressed. Today that rage has a black face because we frankly have no
image of progressive white worker outrage to compete with it. White worker discontent is almost inconceivable in the propaganda system.
Then the lack of these images of white workers in struggle also reflects the stranglehold a sort of right-wing trade unionism and anti-labor legislation has on American workers.
A prophet and a real clergy person will defend unpopular positions even if there is a personal cost associated with it. Most self proclaimed Christians will not do this. Black liberation theology does. They talk the talk. Obama won't even do that!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
